Yes!
The viaduct is always on the downside of the highway.
So, I modified to invert those elements.
Palla, you wrote "Second camera.
The another real may be taken a photo again by using it." Does that mean you’re using photoshop as your ‘second camera’; to modify images to create a new photograph? The modifications you make in photoshop are based on photographic effects, so the resulting image(s) could be said to be an extension of ‘straight’ photography. Or did I misunderstand what you wrote?
高速道路を侵食する歩道橋。
Thanks Stu.
I guess, you understood all right about my saying.
An extension of ‘straight’ photography….My works don’t still attain the level of that.
ハイウェイなるものは引き倒さねばならんのです。
>My works don’t still attain the level of that.
They’re getting better. This last image looks very realistic. It’s only the unusual perspective (and possibly the lighting) that gives it away as being ‘constructed’. I think it’s an interesting creative path to follow. I’m looking forward to seeing more.
I thought that I felt stuck at this way soon.
But now this way may have the possibility of any evolution.
OK, Stu!
I’ve noticed developments in this technique with your recent images, which are different to what you did previously. I’m not sure how far you can go with it, but it’s interesting to see your experiments – if you don’t mind me calling them that 😉
Great!
Upstairs to a highway…viaduct?
Yes!
The viaduct is always on the downside of the highway.
So, I modified to invert those elements.
Palla, you wrote "Second camera.
The another real may be taken a photo again by using it." Does that mean you’re using photoshop as your ‘second camera’; to modify images to create a new photograph? The modifications you make in photoshop are based on photographic effects, so the resulting image(s) could be said to be an extension of ‘straight’ photography. Or did I misunderstand what you wrote?
高速道路を侵食する歩道橋。
Thanks Stu.
I guess, you understood all right about my saying.
An extension of ‘straight’ photography….My works don’t still attain the level of that.
ハイウェイなるものは引き倒さねばならんのです。
>My works don’t still attain the level of that.
They’re getting better. This last image looks very realistic. It’s only the unusual perspective (and possibly the lighting) that gives it away as being ‘constructed’. I think it’s an interesting creative path to follow. I’m looking forward to seeing more.
I thought that I felt stuck at this way soon.
But now this way may have the possibility of any evolution.
OK, Stu!
I’ve noticed developments in this technique with your recent images, which are different to what you did previously. I’m not sure how far you can go with it, but it’s interesting to see your experiments – if you don’t mind me calling them that 😉
"ハイウェイなるものは引き倒さねばならんのです。"とは？
んーたいした意味はないです。いつも下を歩いている私のちょっとしたひがみです。ほんとに倒れてきたら洒落になりませんが・・・
高速道路建設反対！ではなく高速道路不要論者かと思った(^^;