6 Responses

  1. Stu
    |

    Check this out: http://…/

  2. palla
    |

    Shocking and so interesting…
    It seems to me that taking a time and history in the photo is most important factor, because it has to hold too many memorable stories beyond our imagination.

  3. milov
    |

    Little details like the ground of a place are often left undocumented.I would like to see photos of seemingly unsignificant details like this from 100 years ago.

  4. palla
    |

    I think that seemingly unsignificant details are held lots of historical stories indeed. When taking photos of limited objects, it is took more definite.

  5. Stu
    |

    An insignificant detail from 100 years ago would probably look as boring (or interesting) as an insignificant detail from yesterday or today. But I think traces are an imteresting subject for photography. I like the idea of overlaying images; photographs of different places or of the same place but at different times. Joan Fontcuberta http://…/ is one photographer who has attempted this using a technique based on the idea of a palimpsest http://…/ There’s lots of other people who’ve done similar things.. I need to think of some good examples.

  6. palla
    |

    Joan Fontcuberta’s works might show proof of unlimited photography expression.